Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Capa or here we go again
From: hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter)
Date: Sun Jan 27 19:54:28 2008
References: <0JVA00H2C076IG30@l-daemon> <479BCF1B.7040505@waltjohnson.com> <2123341462-1201394250-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1309399132-@bxe107.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <479BFD49.6010605@waltjohnson.com> <C0FD17F3-6735-4019-886B-2CA460F69BDF@pix-that-stimulate.com>
Strange that the the writer's painstaking research and cogitation
weren't accompanied by even a passing question about how ONE
photographer happened to snap the shutter at the moments of the deaths
of TWO different soldiers within a few minutes at the VERY SAME SPOT
on a hillside. Not a word of skepticism on this point! Uncritical
acceptance of this most improbable coincidence is inadequate,
irresponsible journalism.
To my mind, the second and lesser-known photograph is prima facie
evidence of several iterations of a staging. Unfortunately, this piece
does nothing to resolve the controversy.
--howard
On Jan 27, 2008, at 4:31 AM, Tarek Charara wrote:
> There was this essay posted here a few months ago:
>
> <http://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/database/capa_r.html>
>
> For whatever it's worth... :^)
>
> All the best from the south of France!
>
> Tarek
Replies:
Reply from raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] Capa or here we go again)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Capa or here we go again)
In reply to:
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Capa or here we go again)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Capa or here we go again)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Capa or here we go again)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Capa or here we go again)
Message from tarek.charara at pix-that-stimulate.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Capa or here we go again)