Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Vic Ko said: >>> My struggle with buy or not-to-buy the M8 is a matter of afraid of getting stuck with a camera that is unreliable and needs repair.<<< Vic, The unfortunate thing about the M8 is/was the Magenta thing as the #1 problem that was "fixed" with Mickey mouse style IR filters. Yes others had weird things happen also. However many of us had absolutely nothing go wrong with the camera and it worked like a dream M camera should even. Well OK a couple of times a scene glowed like a setting sun in the fires of hell! :-) However at this point in time I imagine the M9 will be a whole new ball of wax without filters and glitches as they'll be a distant past. At least I imagine that will be the case. I had two reactions to your purchase of the M8, first of which ."Why would he buy now when waiting a few more months and get the new improved M9?" Second, "Pay the same price $5000 or nearly so as many did when it was new to the world months ago?" Unless he got it for at least half price. Or quite frankly 75% off the original selling price? Mark Rabiner offered: >> I don't believe it will be unreliable and need repair. But I do fear it will be a frustrating experience coughing up 5 grand for it and then next week news comes out that the M9 or whatever they call it is not going to need the cut off filters.<<< Mark, I can't believe the magenta thing would still be part of the M9 still screwing about with add on filters. Surely not? If that's the case, then anyone still devoted to buying a $5000. or more digital M should check themselves into a re-hab equipment hospital for mentally challenged photographers. :-) ted