Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have the same Summilux - I assume it's the Pre-ASPH version - and I initially coded it by hand using a gizmo I bought from someone on the LUF. As expected the ink from the hand coding wears off over time and currently this lens isn't recognised by the camera. To be honest I haven't noticed any difference in the images. However that may be down to what I've shot so far - not too many white walls <grin>. After saying all of that I've had the coding added to all the lenses that could be coded. Steve On 6/2/08 01:25, "grduprey@mchsi.com" <grduprey@mchsi.com> wrote: > The 35 in my opinion does not need the coding. My 35 Summilux looks just > fine > without it, in fact it cannot be coded. Most think the 28 and wider need > the > coding, but try it first and see what you think.