Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As for the dismissal, it could well be a reflection of other internal issues in the company (that we're not privy to assessing. I've seen that before with other privately held companies.) Good performance might not have been good enough, based on sales projections or loan repayments or cash flow. Thanks to the recent tightening of credit markets, a lot of manufacturers and retailers in the midst of major turnaround projects are feeling a huge pinch. At least Leica can still react, unlike Lillian Vernon and Sharper Image: two enormously famous US retailers which largely stayed the course in a changing market-- right into the dumpster.* My sixth sense, after attending the LSHA presentation last October (which hinted of a VERY ambitious collection of exciting product launches) is that things didn't work out quite as planned. Usually that situation heralds the departure of a senior executive, especially in a privately held company run by venture capital. The other points 1. Price hikes were tied to the drop in the dollar against the Euro. After seeing an item on this week's LUG FS post that I'd have loved (but now costs me 60% more than it would have two years ago) I can understand the frustration of new Leica equipment purchasers. A niche manufacturer such as Leica can't easily cut prices to match currency fluctuations--they haven't the manufacturing flexibility or capital reserves. The price hikes are counter-productive in the US, though--look at the idea of introducing "affordable" lenses that a) suddenly have a $300 price increase and b) get hung up in production delays. I'll use myself as an example: I recently purchased a sensational CV lens (and I believe their most expensive) for less than half the price of the new Summarit "starter" lenses. That's plainly absurd. 2. When has Leica/Leitz EVER had ANYTHING electronic right the first time? In the past 50 years their history with electronics has been abysmal--from the already-obsolete meter in the original Leicaflex to the infamous electronics problems in the first R8s. Buggy or downright obsolete electronics in early production models is as much a company tradition as the red dot! Perhaps a new slogan: "The Red Dot of Courage: I bought a First-Generation electronic Leica!" As one famed Leica collector and historian once mentioned to me, the company historically uses early purchasers as their test lab, making corrections as they go along. Jim Shulman Bryn Mawr, PA *I also have similar thoughts about the Hilary campaign manager replacement, but don't want to turn this thread into a LUG forum item. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jeffery Smith Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 9:33 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] what? I think the company is in trouble. The enormous price hikes and the recent upgrades for life on the heels of a very buggy M8 have all been signs of their problems. This is probably going to be like Hilary Clinton firing her campaign manager, i.e., a sacrificial lamb. -- Jeffery L. Smith New Orleans, LA