Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Square format
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue Feb 26 15:42:44 2008
References: <200802261007.m1QA7ZIr037742@mail.imagecraft.com> <47C3C9BB.25963.342BC6@leica.rcmckee.com> <872FD193-CC61-4507-822C-62647BD52BFA@mindspring.com> <1EEF0FDF-8C9A-4B99-B048-EA185ED7EEDB@mac.com>
 
That would be a strong argument for square to avoid rotating the camera.

ric


On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:30 PM, Lottermoser George wrote:

> weren't 'stereo' images the first squares?
>
> Fond regards,
> George
> george@imagist.com
> www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Ric Carter wrote:
>
>> I don't know, or have forgotten, the origins of our current  
>> "standard" formats for photos. It seems that 6X6 cm is the only  
>> "common" square standard.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Wow, are the Mamiya as cool as the HASSELbald?)
Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Wow, are the Mamiya as cool as the HASSELbald?)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Square format)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Square format)