Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Thu Feb 28 14:35:33 2008
References: <11701290.1204235659412.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <00df01c87a58$a3859310$ea90b930$@net> <7c7efb430802281430n3c492e34x20ff5531556d2fd1@mail.gmail.com>
Now that is interesting......
Is there more info to back this up or lend credence?
Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net
Ok, this is a bit OT, but...
Not long ago, a Nikon technician revealed on Nikon's Japanese website that
D1 didn't have a 2.7MP sensor, but a 10.8MP sensor. It combined data from
multiple pixels to obtain data for a single pixel and stored as a
2.7MPimage. And that's the reason why D1 seemed to have better image
clarity
than its pixel count otherwise suggested.
Ken
Replies:
Reply from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
In reply to:
Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)