Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I guess mine is the latest at 1,1xx,xxx. I think the Aperture priority mode works fine with it though @ 1.4. The pictures of the dolls were all 1.4 Aperture priority. At 08:55 PM 3/5/2008, Peter Klein wrote: >Ah, the plot thickens. Thanks Don. Actually, I think f/1.7 is a >half stop down from f/2, but point taken. > >What complicates matters is that there were three versions of the OM >50/1.4: The oldest singlecoated (and often silvernosed) lenses with >yellow coating, the intermediate multicoated version, and the last >version with a serial number of 1,050,000 or greater. Do you know >which one "Modern" tested? I've tried all three. I got rid of the >first version after a couple of rolls. I still have the second and >third versions. The third version is much better wide open (less >coma, sharper). I don't recall any exposure difference, I think >they both showed little more light between f/2 and f/1.4. > >Anyway, the bottom line is that with fast manual OM lenses on >E-series cameras, the very widest and narrowest stop may require a >custom +/- EV. And you can't trust your in-camera meter at the >extreme stops, either. I found the 50/1.4 occasionally useful on >the E-1, but I usually kept it set at f/2, where it performed nicely >indoors. // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)