Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You're forgetting solar and wind power. On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote: > Digital uses electricity at every step of the way: it therefore requires > the generation of electricity, and that process is neither clean nor cheap > and defintiely contaminates the environment. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Luis Ripoll" <luisripoll@telefonica.net> > To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:18 PM > Subject: RE: [Leica] Not Buying M8 > > > > Don, your arguments are very logical. The only point to comment as on a > > science fiction film, If I was the big boss of a big Company or if I can > > influence the international markets I would promote the marketing idea > > about > > digital is clean, cheap, and not contaminant > > > > Saludos cordiales > > Luis > > > > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre > > de > > Don Dory > > Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2008 16:51 > > Para: Leica Users Group > > Asunto: Re: [Leica] Not Buying M8 > > > > Frank,Individual choice is what drove my family here almost 400 years > ago. > > No problem. But you would not need a new computer or lenses but may > need > > a > > new printer. Or not, many retailers now have an Epson 4800-7800 on > > premises > > so prints can be done elsewhere. > > > > Film is just going to get more expensive and processing more cult like > > unless you do your own. Chemicals will be harder to find as the safety > > Nazi's continue to insist that Dektol is dangerous and requires special > > handling. On the bonus side there are some great film cameras out there > > for > > next to nothing; I picked up a very clean Canon 7 with 35 F2, 50 1.4, > 100 > > F2 > > and 135 3.5 all late black lenses for $300. At those prices I will > still > > use some film. > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Frank Filippone > <red735i@earthlink.net> > > wrote: > > > >> you bring up a good point...... if it is a devalued US $..... > >> > >> The M8 would cost $3500 if it were $1 = 1 EURO. ( currently around > >> $1.5 = > >> 1 > >> EURO ) > >> > >> Then a lot of this discussion of film to digital nonsense would go > away. > >> > >> All of us Americans should buy nothing, and all you Rest Or Worlders > >> should buy only USA Made goods. > >> Then the dollar would rise and the Americans could afford a $3500 > >> Digital M. > >> > >> Anyway, I find the rest of the argument unconvincing. I use film > >> because #1, I am not a pro. I do not have to use digital. Pros have > >> to use digital. > >> #2 I have plenty of film cameras that I won, they work, and they do > >> what I want them to do. I do not have to buy something else. > >> #3 While my personal finances may allow me to go buy a $5K camera Plus > >> SW and Printer and scanner for my existing negatives/transparencies > >> for maybe another $2-5K, I choose to spend my $$$ other places, or not > at > > all. > >> #4 I can still get suitable film for what I like to do, and get it > >> processed, locally ( I live in Los Angeles area so processing is no > >> problem). While some brands have gone away, I have found suitable > >> replacements. > >> #5 My cameras are reliable. They are mechanical, made for 50 year > >> life( or more.... M6TTL is a pretty tough camera) and can be repaired > >> anywhere in the world in a few days by a lot of people. > >> #6 I have the patience to not need to Chimp or otherwise have my film > >> processed in 2 seconds ( I was never a fan of Polaroid either). I can > >> wait. > >> #7 I just plain prefer to use film. It suits me, my lifestyle, and my > >> hobby. > >> > >> Anything wrong with that? For Me? > >> > >> Frank Filippone > >> red735i@earthlink.net > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Don > > don.dory@gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >