Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: KE-7
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Tue Apr 8 06:38:16 2008
References: <1207540904.47f99ca8b82b9@panthermail.uwm.edu> <BAY113-F35D61C0A8DC047EE8349DD8CF30@phx.gbl> <3cad89990804072257l3be2a6fld5acda1e2a470f9b@mail.gmail.com>

On Apr 7, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> Vick,
> Take a cold shower.


or join the equivalent of AA for e-bay addicts,


Steve




>
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> ...cough....cough....sputter....Two hundred dollars?????
>>
>> Oh, thank you guys, from the bottom of my pocket-book.  And for the  
>> sake
>> of my wife and son's well-being, groceries, and ability to buy and  
>> wear new
>> clothes....   :-)
>>
>> I need to get over this fever badly, and quickly.  Maybe a large  
>> baseball
>> bat across the forehead will do it.
>>
>> Also, I understand that the 50/2 Elcan is not a great performer  
>> too, so no
>> redeeming value to buy-and-try the lens.
>>
>> One thing that scares the cr@p out of me is, what if I buy this  
>> thing, how
>> am I ever going to get my money out of it again?  Sure, there's one  
>> born
>> every minute, but how am I going to find him?  And are they never  
>> "female",
>> so it immediately eliminates half the population?
>>
>> Please all, keep telling me to "go out and shoot photos",  
>> "historically
>> the KE-7A is worth the same as a share of <name your defunct  
>> company -
>> Bre-X, NORTEL, ...>"
>>
>> ...Vick
>>
>>
>> From: amr3@uwm.edu
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> To: lug@leica-users.org
>>> Subject: [Leica] Re: KE-7
>>> Date: Sun,  6 Apr 2008 23:01:44 -0500
>>>
>>> Quoting : "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net>
>>>
>>>> Just to make you feel bad.....
>>>>
>>>> I do remember that at the end of the production cycle, I saw new  
>>>> KE-7A
>>>> cameras selling for around $2K.  And gain, a few years later,  
>>>> when the
>>> US
>>>> decided to rid themselves of the cameras, they sold for around $1K
>>> with lens
>>>> , used, new in box.......as surplus......
>>>
>>> ......................................................................................................................................
>>> To make you feel worse......
>>>
>>> In the 1980's, our department, through government surplus,  
>>> obtained a
>>> KE-7 with
>>> 50mm Elcan lens for about $200.  We traded it in for a more usable  
>>> kit:
>>> two
>>> M4-2 bodies, a winder, a 35mm black Summicron, and a 90mm Summicron.
>>> Before
>>> the deal, for fun, I took a self-portrait holding the KE-7 in  
>>> vertical
>>> position
>>> so the top plate engraving showed.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
>>> University Information Technology Services
>>> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>>> amr3@uwm.edu
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (amr3@uwm.edu) ([Leica] Re: KE-7)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Re: KE-7)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: KE-7)