Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]AH! I can always count on 'ole faithful to blow (plus or minus 30 posts) cocktail anyone? Eric On 4/21/08, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote: > Leicas are impossible. Implausible. Unworkable. > The wrong tool for the wrong job every single time > Unviable. Unenviable > The unviability of so much of Leica gear is a resurgent recurrent thread on > the LEICA USERS GROUP the entire dozen or so years > i've been on it; or in it. > The Noctilux a prime recurring culprit. > Yet the Noctilux seems to be the glass of choice for Ted and I see just > last week Tina and certainly in the past Rei Shinozuka and a other masters. > I have used it a whole bunch. > Not missed the focus on that many shots. > > The modus operandi of Noctilux might seem to be > f 1 AND BE THERE!!! > > But in effect > IT JUST AIN'T SO! > Its more of an f 1000th of a second and be there kind of deal in real > practice at least for me. I bet for others. You'd hear them say so in their > sleep. > As a day in the life light just does not cooperate. > You end up having to STOP DOWN. The horrors! > But with all your shudder speeds at 1000th. > That's the constant. > > An ideal working situation for a die hard Noctilux user would seem to be to > have two bodies. One with slow film 50 or 100 so you could f 1 till the > cows > come home.* > AND one with 400 or 1600 so you could really use the lens for its intended > use. Shooting junkies in dark alleys between garbage cans petting their > black cats at midnight. With someone's flashlight shooting into the top > left > hand corner of the lens just right off axis. > > I don't even know what the top shudder speed is with an M8. But I bet it > makes Noctilux shooting more fun as its probably a lot faster than f > 1000th. > .... > Ok I checked, its 8000th. Three clicks up from 1000th. > Which is the difference between 100 and 400 film. > I'd think f 8000th of a second and be there with a Noct would be loads of > fun. You'd only need one camera. > But shooting white bed sheet ads in the Bonneville salt flats at the SUMMER > SOLSTICE AT HIGH NOON you'd have to stop down to f 5.6 or further even at > ISO 100. > Thereby blowing your whole shoot as we hear now. > F 5.6 AND DON'T BE THERE!!! > Is what we are hearing now. > I've shot hundreds of shots having to stop down right around there and did > the depth of my Pan F or Delta 100 or Neopan 1600 save me? > This DOES NOT ring that little bell in my head which tells me that things > are honkey dory. > My nose is sniffing. > > I suggest those with Noctili I guess you need to have M8's have an > F 5.6 and be there day. > Blacktape your f stop dial to that station. > And go out and shoot like crazy and see if anything comes out when you get > it back from the drug store. > I bet almost all of it does. > > Then post it to the LUG. > > > > > * or with an M8 firmware update to instate what's known in Nikon world to > be > AUTO ISO > Which I don't leave home without. > You can set your shudder and f stop parameters > And have your ISO do the moving around. > > > Mark William Rabiner > markrabiner.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >