Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] why do bombs whistle?
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Sun Nov 2 07:00:35 2008
References: <82c9dd70811011405j671e1814v13d368bdd7a1f177@mail.gmail.com> <200811012122.mA1LMOGb066266@server1.waverley.reid.org> <754E60FA7B522D6DA1DAE716@hindolveston.reid.org> <200811021328.mA2DSKpS081465@server1.waverley.reid.org>
 
The use of obfuscatory in a general conversation could be considered
obfuscatory.  ;-)

SonC

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Marc James Small 
<marcsmall@comcast.net>wrote:

>
>
> Thanks, Brian.  The use of obscure academic slang in a general conversation
> is odd, if not outright obfuscatory.
>
> Marc
>
>
Replies: Reply from bill at photobynelsch.com (Bill) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Reply from lindnich at tesco.net (lindnich@tesco.net) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
 In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)