Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] why do bombs whistle?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Nov 2 09:19:02 2008
References: <82c9dd70811011405j671e1814v13d368bdd7a1f177@mail.gmail.com> <200811012122.mA1LMOGb066266@server1.waverley.reid.org> <754E60FA7B522D6DA1DAE716@hindolveston.reid.org> <200811021328.mA2DSKpS081465@server1.waverley.reid.org> <a3f189160811020700l61f0cbbaw2bfff1acd91d6789@mail.gmail.com>
the use of comp sci is perhaps a bit obfuscatory, but...
the punishment is worse than the crime...
Steve
On Nov 2, 2008, at 8:00 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
> The use of obfuscatory in a general conversation could be considered
> obfuscatory. ;-)
>
> SonC
>
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net
> >wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Brian. The use of obscure academic slang in a general
>> conversation
>> is odd, if not outright obfuscatory.
>>
>> Marc
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies:
Reply from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Obfuscation)
In reply to:
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)