Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If it had not had all the problems I read about then I'd have gotten one. But the stories about poor rangefinder alignment, and things like that kept me away...also it was not exactly in the category I was taking about, if I remember it was around 3 grand new. They are still 1500 used or so...I'd rather save a few more pennies and get a used M8 with all I have hear about the RD1. Now had the RD1 been a decent camera with good customer support...that'd have made a difference to me. Lottermoser George wrote: > Wasn't that the Epson RD1? > It should have flown off the shelves like an iPod. > > Fond regards, > George > > george@imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > On Dec 20, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Harrison McClary wrote: > >> I was meaning just that, a M mount that is less expensive to >> introduce more people to the thrills of Leica. The CL was just this, >> not an M by any means, but still a decent enough camera and it used M >> lenses. The Pana/Leicas are nice, I just bought one for my >> daughter...but an M or even a "pretend" M it is not. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Harrison McClary Harrison McClary Photography harrison@mcclary.net http://www.mcclary.net ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography http://www.imagestocksouth.com Tobacco Road: Personal Blog: http://www.mcclary.net/blog