Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 20 21:39:41 2008
References: <200812192238.mBJMcWqP029064@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-DS680A361B7374EA7F19661D4F10@phx.gbl> <494CF6E0.1060702@mcclary.net> <3cad89990812200645r3d5745faoe0e434bdf47904df@mail.gmail.com> <494D6085.5040900@mcclary.net> <9580F7DA-99F6-42FC-9C56-C8A90FA624F2@mac.com> <494D7A5B.9080308@mcclary.net>
precisely my point.
the little CL digital for M lenses
seems easier imagined
than manufactured
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Dec 20, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Harrison McClary wrote:
> .I'd rather save a few more pennies and get a used M8
In reply to:
Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)