Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/02/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica
From: leica at web-options.com (Bob W)
Date: Tue Feb 17 12:17:10 2009
References: <200902170300.n1H30IaS007669@server1.waverley.reid.org> <7875AF61-89CE-4F46-B685-BFE10DE1B82D@optonline.net> <36172e5a0902162241h19c3de47h7b79ac76190bf796@mail.gmail.com> <8D555D84-5209-44D9-B16F-FA733180E6E6@teleport.com><36172e5a0902170003oee34f08rbf6cce8f36127102@mail.gmail.com> <499A8B7A.9080904@gmx.de>
How come the M8 is so much bigger than the M3 then?
Bob
>
> Larry,
> there's plenty of room in the film chamber for all the
> electronics you
> could ever need for a camera. removing the take up spool would also
> provude room for the power source.
>
> I'm still rather sad about the eventual failure of the Rollei 3003
> concept, that would have been ideal for an interchangeable
> digital back.
> (Rollei did have one planned, recording images on a floppy,
> but it never
> got far beyond the prototype stage).
>
Replies:
Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Reply from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] LTM versus M)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)