Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]These are the specific sections of the copyright rules that I was concerned about. (appended from Slobodan's information) Under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. copyright statute, it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports. COMMENT: Fairy's work does not fit any of these categories. The painting he created was sold and used for posters and the cover of magazines. Only the owner of copyright in a work has the right to prepare, or to authorize someone else to create, a new version of that work. Accordingly, you cannot claim copyright to another's work, no matter how much you change it, unless you have the owner's consent. COMMENT: Apparently AP did not give consent. i.e. the lawsuit. This might be an interesting case, relevant to both artists and photographers. Larry Z