Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Henning, > >I have examined both images, and, to me, there is a dilemma. To me, >the first image is not as sharp when viewed at normal gallery size, >but is very sharp when viewed large. The second image is quite sharp >at gallery size, but one does not have the opportunity to see the >larger image if he or she is interested. > Yes, that's it exactly. Plus, the image that the gallery software resized is warmer in tone than the one that is sized correctly. That also bothers me. >It seems we have to make a choice. If I have a so-so image, I size >it so that it can't be enlarged. If I feel the image can stand >close examination, I upload the larger image. > >I have another question. I sometimes upload TIF images, which >Brian's software converts to JPEG. Does that give a better gallery >image than uploading a JPEG? I haven't come to a conclusion on that >yet. > >Jim Nichols I haven't tried the tif option as I usually don't want to upload that large an image, but I might try it as an experiment. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com