Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
If it's that good, why do folks diddle around with all the power-sucking,
footprint hogging, massive expense, disc-dying, mind-numbing complexity of
raid arrays?
With a decent label maker and some plastic holders (I'm wondering if I
haven't figured out a use for all those extra slide pages I have) you could
keep years of work in something like a coin collectors album.
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Brian Reid <reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> wrote:
> From: Brian Reid <reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Flash lifespan
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 2:00 PM
> >From 2000 to 2002 I worked on a project with NASA to
> upgrade the computers and networks that were used in the
> International Space Station. One of NASA's axioms, based
> on their experience thus far, was that anything that went up
> to be used by astronauts needed to be fitted with flash
> memory because NASA believed that flash stood the best
> chance of long-term survival in harsh space conditions.
>
> It is now 7 years later and possibly they believe something
> else now (the group has dispersed) but I continue to believe
> that flash memory is extremely rugged and reliable.
>
> You can wear it out by using it too much, but that's
> another story.
>
> Wasn't it EPROMs that were erased with a giant flash,
> despite what Toshiba's press office says? Flash is
> electrically erasable; EPROMs use optical (UV) erasure.
>
>
> >
> > This has probably come up before so I apologize for
> needing a reiteration, but how long can an SD card hold its
> data without deteriorating?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information