Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:50:45 -0400
References: <23a0a61f0910211727j22c205e6k6594e6382ca9c0d6@mail.gmail.com> <440b792d0910211759v42bbb4deh802feadf3d60ef93@mail.gmail.com> <102220090519.3930.4ADFEB610000129400000F5A223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com> <f091c6f20910212258n5c877e9ey1909ab57c7637da5@mail.gmail.com>

;^)

ric


On Oct 22, 2009, at 1:58 AM, Clive Moss wrote:

> Kodachrome at 10 ASA. Who needed more? At 25, the world started going
> to hell in a handbasket. 50 ASA - BAH, HUMBUG! Who needs it?
> --



In reply to: Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive Moss) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)