Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 improvements
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:36:21 +0100
References: <C70B1FE2.574CC%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AAC70230-D98E-4FA6-BD1B-2B47F6A1FA70@btinternet.com> <35610820-F556-4185-BD6F-50B1A00862DC@frozenlight.eu> <46355ECD-8E5E-42AF-9A2B-F7552990BB74@gmail.com> <4AE5E5F3.1010105@gmx.de>

Yes, Douglas!

I confess you I was tempted to write the same as you

Saludos
Lluis



El 26/10/2009, a las 19:09, Douglas Sharp escribi?:

> And a price reduction of about 1000 euros :-)
> Douglas
>
> Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:
>> Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that  
>> than for me.
>>
>> ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I  
>> prefer other facilities as:
>>
>> - Viewfinder at least 0,72x
>> - Sensor auto cleaning
>> - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it
>>
>> Saludos,
>> Lluis
>>
>>
>> El 26/10/2009, a las 18:58, Nathan Wajsman escribi?:
>>
>>> I can think of at least the following that would be included in a  
>>> future M10:
>>>
>>> - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of  
>>> reducing pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology  
>>> in a couple of years)
>>> - a flip-out LCD with Live View
>>> - video capability
>>> - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras
>>> - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability
>>>
>>> Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two  
>>> are), but I can imagine that they are for the market.
>>>
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>> Alicante, Spain
>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>>
>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote:
>>>
>>>> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for  
>>>> me :-)
>>>> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso, though  
>>>> of course higher iso would not be a retrograde step...
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] M9 improvements)