Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 improvements
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:47:42 +0000
References: <C70B1FE2.574CC%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AAC70230-D98E-4FA6-BD1B-2B47F6A1FA70@btinternet.com> <35610820-F556-4185-BD6F-50B1A00862DC@frozenlight.eu><46355ECD-8E5E-42AF-9A2B-F7552990BB74@gmail.com> <4AE5E5F3.1010105@gmx.de>

 
I'd go for that right now, as price is what is keeping me away from the M9  
at this point.
Gene -------------- Original message from Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at 
gmx.de>: --------------


> And a price reduction of about 1000 euros :-)
> Douglas
> 
> Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:
> > Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that 
> > than for me.
> >
> > ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I 
> > prefer other facilities as:
> >
> > - Viewfinder at least 0,72x
> > - Sensor auto cleaning
> > - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it
> >
> > Saludos,
> > Lluis
> >
> >
> > El 26/10/2009, a las 18:58, Nathan Wajsman escribi?:
> >
> >> I can think of at least the following that would be included in a 
> >> future M10:
> >>
> >> - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of reducing 
> >> pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology in a couple 
> >> of years)
> >> - a flip-out LCD with Live View
> >> - video capability
> >> - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras
> >> - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability
> >>
> >> Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two are), 
> >> but I can imagine that they are for the market.
> >>
> >> Nathan
> >>
> >> Nathan Wajsman
> >> Alicante, Spain
> >> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> >> http://www.greatpix.eu
> >> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> >>
> >> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> >> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote:
> >>
> >>> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for me :-)
> >>> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso, though of 
> >>> course higher iso would not be a retrograde step...
> >>> Frank
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] M9 improvements)