Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 improvements
From: lucien_vd at mac.com (lucien_vd at mac.com)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:15:32 +0100
References: <C70B1FE2.574CC%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AAC70230-D98E-4FA6-BD1B-2B47F6A1FA70@btinternet.com> <35610820-F556-4185-BD6F-50B1A00862DC@frozenlight.eu> <46355ECD-8E5E-42AF-9A2B-F7552990BB74@gmail.com>
 
Lluis,

The M9 finder is the good old 0,72 in a deeper body = 0,68.

I agree about the selector.

Lucien

Le 26-oct.-09 ? 19:06, Lluis Ripoll Querol a ?crit :

> Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that  
> than for me.
>
> ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I  
> prefer other facilities as:
>
> - Viewfinder at least 0,72x
> - Sensor auto cleaning
> - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it
>
> Saludos,
> Lluis
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] M9 improvements)