Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes Steve, but when you take again your M3 or M6 as I've do last days shooting some film again, they fit better on my hand, there are still a pleasure to use those mechanical engins! Amiti?s Lluis El 30/10/2009, a las 16:54, Steve Barbour escribi?: > > On Oct 30, 2009, at 2:15 AM, lucien_vd at mac.com wrote: > >> Lluis, >> >> The M9 finder is the good old 0,72 in a deeper body = 0,68. > > interesting Lucien... > > I wonder if the relationship is linear... > > that would make it about 5.6% thicker.... > > I am now so used to it, it feels so like my M7.... > > ? > > best, > > Steve >> >> I agree about the selector. >> >> Lucien >> >> Le 26-oct.-09 ? 19:06, Lluis Ripoll Querol a ?crit : >> >>> Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that >>> than for me. >>> >>> ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I >>> prefer other facilities as: >>> >>> - Viewfinder at least 0,72x >>> - Sensor auto cleaning >>> - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it >>> >>> Saludos, >>> Lluis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information