Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PDN Reviews M9
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:55:33 -0800
References: <C718D235.58007%mark@rabinergroup.com> <83618.57615.qm@web86710.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
 
It's really simple: the M9 should only be reviewed by Leica users,
preferably one with experience with at least the M7, if not the M8.

Then, it's the finest digital M almost without flaws besides the price.

Otherwise, it's just an overpriced piece of metal.

***
Heck, what's there to review? :-)

You have the $$$, then M9 good.

No $$$? then it's irrelevant.

-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] PDN Reviews M9)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PDN Reviews M9)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PDN Reviews M9)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] PDN Reviews M9)