Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> It's really simple: the M9 should only be reviewed by Leica users, > preferably one with experience with at least the M7, if not the M8. > > Then, it's the finest digital M almost without flaws besides the price. > > Otherwise, it's just an overpriced piece of metal. > > *** > Heck, what's there to review? :-) > > You have the $$$, then M9 good. > > No $$$? then it's irrelevant. It has the most direct and immediate meaning to those many who've made a commitment to Leica M in the past. To those who already have some Leica M glass they'd like to get going again. They know what rangefinder shooting is all about and don't have to convince themselves that they like it. Putting into the hands of a guy whose trying to figure out how to make for a two not four eyed face is ridiculous. I'd be looking for a photographer at least 60 years of age. But someone younger could get it. The reviewing job. Mark William Rabiner