Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, did *I* say *I* use JPG. You have a problem of jumping to conclusion. I am answering your statement that most people get better print from their inkjet, and I 'm telling you your reasoning is wrong. I didn't say that's what I did. I have two digital cameras, and I don't shoot JPG. I even shoot manual @ F2 35-100/ zoom at times. I said I print on canvas and rice paper and everything in between and you jumped to conclusion that I don't print photo rag. I probably shoot more than most people here and print more than most people. Give it a break if you don't bother to read what I actually WRITE. On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: >> No doubt, but the point is a straight JPG from a DSLR is most likely >> perfectly focus, nice vibrant colors, the right ISO etc. >> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> What comes out of the DSLR's are crafted in Photoshop. >>> Not standing over an enlarger with dodging and burning tools. >>> >> > > > So one minute you're breaking your neck pulling "wet Prints" the next > you've > got your DSLR set to jpeg instead of RAW? > Perhaps decide if your really serious about this or just fooling around. > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog: http://rfman.wordpress.com // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963