Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses"
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:35:46 -0600
References: <C71F6A4A.585D2%mark@rabinergroup.com> <E737F8E3-32AF-40C0-9D35-4210CB6CF2AF@mac.com>
 
George,

I find it is a compromise between functionality and affordability.  Some of 
us have to live within our means.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses"


>" But it remains a compromise of the designed functionality of the lens."> 
>Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")