Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film & digital
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:46:49 +0100
References: <088CC2B3-F7C3-4C99-AD81-0550DE7DA14F@gmail.com> <4B22DF5E.5000701@wanadoo.nl> <200912120216.CCB18955@rg4.comporium.net>

Thanks Tina for your opinion,

Some day I would like do a better test, same lens etc... and compare  
the differences

Saludos,
Lluis


El 12/12/2009, a las 3:16, Tina Manley escribi?:

> At 07:10 PM 12/11/2009, you wrote:
>> Hi Lluis,
>>
>> I like the second best. But that's because it has less DOF.
>> Very hard to make a decision when the lenses are different.
>>
>> Michiel Fokkema
>
> I agree.
>
> Tina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)