Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which is better?
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:17:35 +0100
References: <6a7544a60912111831v19efa3c6jb288c6ca1a1cd215@mail.gmail.com>
 
Hi Larry,

Thanks for your opinion, I agree.

Yes, the day I was shot this I had two cameras hanging....

Cheers
Lluis

El 12/12/2009, a las 3:31, Lawrence Zeitlin escribi?:

> Lluis,
> I'll go with the consensus. To my eyes number 2 is better. The tone is
> richer and somehow it seems sharper. The reduced DOF concentrates  
> attention
> on the foreground figures. But I do hope that it won't start the  
> film vs.
> digital argument again. What did you do? Walk around with two cameras
> hanging from your neck?
>
> Larry Z
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Which is better?)