Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Except that Gerry and the many others have made it clear that price and camera size are a concern. It is easy to say bigger is better, but sometimes Leica is just not in the card. Gerry clearly says he can afford ~$600. Unless someone is giving Gerry money to buy the better camera, then yes, Nathan is right, the answer gets tiring. If anyone is in that generous mood, I'd like a newer car to replace my 20 years old Camry. A 2000 Camry would do nicely. Thank you. :-) If someone wants to justify buying a M9 vs. I don't know, Nikon D300, and can afford to do so, then the answer makes sense. If the price is a non-starter, then it doesn't matter at all. On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: > I agree. > > Tina > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Rei Shinozuka <shino at panix.com> wrote: > > > > > i don't think mark is so much a naysayer, as the voice in the wilderness > > who points out that in the digital world today, there's a performance > gap > > between system cameras and P&Ss. he attributes much of this to sensor > size > > differences. i tend to agree with him. > > > > -rei > > > > -- > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]