Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Flare Question......
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:58:39 -0700
References: <00f801cb4e04$7e747c30$7b5d7490$@earthlink.net> <AANLkTinJkCWUkMDh=_MKq053ge7ffMBySebsyB+kFpR_@mail.gmail.com>

Well, the Tri Elmar has basically a lousy hood.. it is the same as the 21
ASPH....the thing has really little to no shading and when used with a
filter, is worse.. the filter is almost at the end of the shade anyway.....

And I did have the UV/IR filter on.... ( M8 camera.....)

And the sun, or rather white wall reflection thereof, was in the shot.....

In doing some more thinking, maybe Geoff did hit on the problem....
reflection by the B+W 486 filter.....

I will try to post something later to get a better response.....

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net



Have you checked for other possible contributing factors? Dirty front
element or filter? Filter quality (if fitted)? Reflections into your shot
from another source? The inside of the (extended) lens hood?
 My guess is gruk on the front optical surface. Worst case there is damage
to the front element coating but finger grease is much more likely. Maybe
post a sample shot?
Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 7 September 2010 06:45, Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote:

> I got some flare from my 90 Elmarit M ( the one with the built in hood)...
> and I was surprised.
>
> The (partial) background ( and source of the flare) was the reflected 
> light from a very bright wall, the foreground ( also called subject 
> material) was a group of dancers under a tall roof.....  so I was 
> shooting under the roof, while the wall was a long way away, but 
> visible in a corner of the image area
>
> Exposure was 1 / 250 at F2.8... background would have been sunny 16.....
> F16
> at 1 /160....  M8, UV/IR Filter on the lens.
>
> Do you think I would have had the same results if I had used a 
> different 90?
> AA?
>
> PS.. Did not get flare using my Tri Elmar.....F4 @ 1/125... same 
> camera position, obviously different field of view....
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Flare Question......)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Flare Question......)
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Flare Question......)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Flare Question......)