Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, it would be more. I have the formulae but don't have the details to work it out (you need the film to nodal point distance, among other things). Marty On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > The magnification at medium format it says is 21 do we know what the > magnification is for the Leica for I assume 35mm? I'm going to guess its > higher. > > 1600mm at 35 I'd think would be a higher mag than 1700mm at Brownie film. > > > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:05:24 +1030 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >> >> That's a baby. ?This: >> http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e10 >> 0393a1b >> is bigger and, I believe, costs more. ?A one-off made for some very >> rich dude. >> >> Marty > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >