Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bet you 3 bucks its less. Rei?!?!?!? -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com > From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:34:56 +1030 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens > > Yes, it would be more. I have the formulae but don't have the details > to work it out (you need the film to nodal point distance, among other > things). > > Marty > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> > wrote: >> The magnification at medium format it says is 21 do we know what the >> magnification is for the Leica for I assume 35mm? I'm going to guess its >> higher. >> >> 1600mm at 35 I'd think would be a higher mag than 1700mm at Brownie film. >> >> >> >> -------------------- >> Mark William Rabiner >> Photography >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >> mark at rabinergroup.com >> >> >>> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:05:24 +1030 >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >>> >>> That's a baby. ?This: >>> http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e >>> 10 >>> 0393a1b >>> is bigger and, I believe, costs more. ?A one-off made for some very >>> rich dude. >>> >>> Marty >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information