Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank, I stand corrected. I don't own any Canon glass but I assumed the 24-70 would fare better than that. It would have been interesting though if they'd been able to mount the Summilux on the 1Ds and then compare. Certainly would have been a better test of the relative merits of the two sensors. But I guess as Tim said 'it's a camera system to camera system comparison. For fun.' Jim On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote: > As zoom lenses go the Canon 24-105 L lens is excellent, not a dog. Unless > you thing all zooms are dogs, as I am inclined to. > I have quite a few lenses of different makes. None better the 50mm > summilux Asph... > FD > > On 18 Nov, 2010, at 18:17, James Laird wrote: > >> Don't put a dog >> of a lens in front of the sensor and compare it with a Summilux! > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >