Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:31:14 +0000
References: <p06230909c90a08a455e1@192.168.1.18> <AANLkTi=yAfCtqoWMbsOnJR2vRpgc7QVqq+QdeX_GhLoR@mail.gmail.com> <20101118161819.GE60960@selenium.125px.com> <AANLkTi=YswU8Rgi7gEA_veqhuPrdroGAXNGqNqrjX-Qn@mail.gmail.com>
As zoom lenses go the Canon 24-105 L lens is excellent, not a dog. Unless
you thing all zooms are dogs, as I am inclined to.
I have quite a few lenses of different makes. None better the 50mm summilux
Asph...
FD
On 18 Nov, 2010, at 18:17, James Laird wrote:
> Don't put a dog
> of a lens in front of the sensor and compare it with a Summilux!
Replies:
Reply from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
Reply from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
Reply from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
In reply to:
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)