Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons
From: gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:37:45 -0700
References: <p06230909c90a08a455e1@192.168.1.18>, <AANLkTi=yAfCtqoWMbsOnJR2vRpgc7QVqq+QdeX_GhLoR@mail.gmail.com>, <20101118161819.GE60960@selenium.125px.com>, <AANLkTi=YswU8Rgi7gEA_veqhuPrdroGAXNGqNqrjX-Qn@mail.gmail.com>, <664EB1D1-46F5-4B5D-A98C-E3F4A72C08CD@btinternet.com>
Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com writes:
> As zoom lenses go the Canon 24-105 L lens is excellent, not a dog. Unless
> you thing all zooms are dogs, as I am inclined to.
> I have quite a few lenses of different makes. None better the 50mm
> summilux Asph...
> FD
The Leica 50/1.4 lens is an exceptional lens. But beg, borrow, or steal a
Leica R mount 35-70/2.8 or 70-180/2.8 lens. Capable of cutting edge images
as good as the best Leica primes.
Greg Lorenzo
Calgary, Canada
In reply to:
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons)