Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:22:53 +0100
References: <C9281BE8.7A05%mark@rabinergroup.com> <6F6BDBE8D80245F0B07AF0FCC7DF7CB0@syneticfeba505> <F71769EE-E047-4039-9018-7E453DEC9CBA@sfr.fr> <CEF4843B-8C0C-47C3-AA3E-A890D0B50A4B@gmail.com>
Le 11 d?c. 10 ? 14:16, Steve Barbour a ?crit :
>
>
> Philippe, thank you
>
I, should thank you Steve
Amiti?s
Philippe
Replies:
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard at sfr.fr) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on language ambiguity ... qui pro quo)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] the beautiful faces...)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] the beautiful faces...)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)