Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 05:41:45 -0800
References: <C9281BE8.7A05%mark@rabinergroup.com> <6F6BDBE8D80245F0B07AF0FCC7DF7CB0@syneticfeba505> <F71769EE-E047-4039-9018-7E453DEC9CBA@sfr.fr> <CEF4843B-8C0C-47C3-AA3E-A890D0B50A4B@gmail.com> <6D3F3595-822B-4ECA-9024-07BE2EFC3325@sfr.fr>
On Dec 11, 2010, at 5:22 AM, philippe.amard wrote:
>
> Le 11 d?c. 10 ? 14:16, Steve Barbour a ?crit :
>>
>>
>> Philippe, thank you
>>
>
> I, should thank you Steve
je t'en pris....
you are absolutely right Philippe,
(however in that particular image, the focus was on fusako's new doo, by
choice, the subject of the posting...)
:-)
but I do understand,
Steve
>
> Amiti?s
> Philippe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] the beautiful faces...)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] the beautiful faces...)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)