Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/12/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] NOW: What is a "Fine Photograph" ? was The perfect Photographer
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:26:20 -0600
References: <6EC54D83-17B9-4BC0-946C-E6BE51C5CA8C@gmail.com> <FBCD94E5-4FDC-4DF4-8E5F-251163DB062F@mac.com> <D41F95FE-804C-4693-9B40-987C362FAAE3@gmail.com> <696AB2AD-F395-438E-BC7E-3EDEB0FC074F@gmail.com> <AANLkTi=RntQ6rAyM=UVS=Dts51Li6fQgn1bP0ZZgcKKJ@mail.gmail.com>
See now this IS another subject altogether.
What makes a:
Great photograph
Beautiful photograph
Fine photograph
Classic photograph
Powerful photograph
Strong photograph
and/or a
Snapshot photograph
Weak photograph
Average photograph
Below average photograph
and of course
everyone's MWV (mileage will vary)
Yet we through these terms around willy nilly
often leaving me tilting my head like puppy
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Dec 17, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> It's a fine photo.
Replies:
Reply from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] NOW: What is a "Fine Photograph" ? was The perfect Photographer)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] NOW: What is a "Fine Photograph" ? was The perfec Photographer!)
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)