Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2011-01-05-12:07:06 tedgrant at shaw.ca: > AA's are merely big piles of rocks and ferns as sterile as a neutered Monk! You go, Ted! Every now and then someone needs to take a poke at the Cult of Ansel. And not a moment too soon, given some of the disbelieving responses you've gotten... I have immense respect for Adams as a photographic technician and craftsman, and for the way he synthesized aspects of photographic practice into a coherent whole, and communicated that. But the photos rarely move me. And yes, I have seen genuwyine Adams prints. They had a certain presence as objects, but still didn't really make me fall in love with the images. The ones I saw were really (perhaps hyper-) dramatic, with black black blacks and white whites, pretty dark in overall tone (someone told me this was the mark of a particular phase in Adams's printing life), and seemed if anything a little over-the-top. And I also agree that there are others (even here on the LUG) who make lamdscapes come more alive (to me). Mr. Adler is indeed an example - there seems to be an attention to light and the way human feelings and an image interact, and an almost lit-from-within feeling in some of his photos. -Jeff