Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:52:54 -0600
References: <1AF19668-19CA-4E33-B00D-4F6C62C5AD3D@mac.com> <AANLkTi=GaPvZ0JgsCVr-EwZZWSv1f2bDdgmqDgZbyRq-@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTincfXkMJShD1xHxiY6xRsCvTVc9BnwgxtqZNVkN@mail.gmail.com>
 
My eye sees the vast majority of his work as artful, beautiful and 
respectful.
At the same time I see some of it as a bit contrived.
There may also be individual images, which I've not seen, that cross my 
particular line of acceptability.

Regards,
George
(from iPad)

On Jan 17, 2011, at 17:24, leo wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:

> not safe for work link
> 
> just curious, I know it's an old argument, but do you think jock sturges is
> exploitative or art?
> 
> http://www.trishsouth.com/SITE/Photographers/Jock_Sturges/index.php?page=Art
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?)