Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:42:59 +1030
References: <629C0AE8-7426-4557-895D-DABEDBA91071@sfr.fr> <C963E6EC.9CA2%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AANLkTi=9BtbsPQgr_5QeL9N9xZyTPZa4BsUN49pYJbdO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=49FYEStp8_2RdFz0jr=ex=RM9iYEigf0CN8SZ@mail.gmail.com>

I was joking about the S2 Geoff.  Stefan should quit and let you sell
the cool aid, er, I mean advertise Leica.

A lot was said before Stefan became the official spokesperson for the
company.  I was told twice to my face that a digital M was impossible
in the mid 1990s.

Marty

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> I think that you are safe from seeing an adapter to fit R to S. I'm not so
> sure that many R lens owners regard spending 25 thousand or whatever as a
> solution to use those lenses anyway!
>
> Back on the difficulties with producing a digital M can you imagine what 
> the
> camera would have cost in the earlier days of dSLR's? I think that they 
> were
> tellling the truth at the time with the then current sensor
> technology/costs.
>
> This is historically interesting from Stefan Daniel (pre-M8 actual release)
>
> .........Beyond that the digital M will have a focal length crop factor of
> 1.33. This technical constraint is necessary because our top priority is to
> deliver the utmost picture quality. Given the optical reality of M lenses
> and today's state of sensor technology, the ideal solution for our
> customers, a full-format sensor, would not live up to our high standards.
> This is particularly true for aspects such as vignetting and sharpness from
> image centre to corner. In this respect we've already reduced the thickness
> of the cover glass and filters located before the sensor to an absolute
> minimum so that laterally impacting light rays do not cause unwanted
> calculations. The radius of the micro lenses and their positioning before
> the sensor was designed in such a way that they channel as much light onto
> the pixel as possible. These measures and others ensure the picture quality
> that one has come to expect from the M system. The crop factor was selected
> so that the same picture angles are maintained - all one has to do is take 
> a
> different lens: a 21mm turns intoa 28mm, a 28 into a 35. Having considered
> our options we are convinced that this is the best solution, in terms of
> attainable picture quality and - since the costs of a sensor increase
> exponentially to their size - in terms of the price of a digital M....
> ?Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
> On 25 January 2011 17:36, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The worst thing would be if all they can come up with is an adaptor
>> for the S2. ?I know Leica have said they won't, but they also said
>> they couldn't make a digital M, then a full-frame digital M . . . and
>> so many other things. ?Lucky I like their cameras and lenses a lot.
>>
>> Marty
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>> wrote:
>> > The worst thing could happen they actually do come out with an R10. The
>> we
>> > have to face the fact that we don't have nine grand USD. Just like many
>> of
>> > us had to face the fact that we don't have the seven grand for an M9. We
>> > have to be careful what we wish for. Make sure we also wish not just for
>> an
>> > M9 or R10 but the money to get one us to buy one too.
>> > Doesn't do me any good with all the other nice photographers shooting
>> with
>> > an M9. I need to have one.
>> >
>> >
>> > --------------------
>> > Mark William Rabiner
>> > Photography
>> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> > mark at rabinergroup.com
>> > Cars: ? http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> From: Philippe Amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr>
>> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> >> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:48:39 +0100
>> >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Le 25 janv. 11 ? 04:13, Sonny Carter a ?crit :
>> >>
>> >>> Give it up; ?we don't need no R10.
>> >>
>> >> Give me a dream though ;-)
>> >> Marylin, Elvis, and the man on the moon were,
>> >> and still remain for some.
>> >>
>> >> Amicalement
>> >> Philippe
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Leica Users Group.
>> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video)
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Hullo. Leica R Solution - now in video)