Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have a Nikon D700 for high iso. I don't use it much at all. I expect it will last longer than 4 years too. Frank ----- Original Message ---- From: Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Friday, 11 February, 2011 10:58:43 Subject: Re: [Leica] More new Fuji X100 info Frank, Might be for you, but High ISO capabilities is a pretty compelling reason to upgrade for all of us who primarily shoot wildlife in dense jungles. Cheers Jayanand On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote: > I am not entirely in agreement here. True, several new models with more >features may have been released during the 4 years but that doesn't make >your >existing camera worse, or stop working, so unless you have an overwhelming >urge >to possess something new it is rarely -necessary- to change. > The cameras I use are all digital. My Canon EOS 1Ds mk2 still works as > well as >it did 5 years ago and there is nothing about the subsequent models worth >changing it for IMO. > FD > > On 11 Feb, 2011, at 03:12, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > >> Better US$1200 for four years than US$7000 for four years. (-: >> All digital equipment has a life of less than four years anyway. >> Cheers >> Jayanand > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information