Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8
From: john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:01:21 +0000 (UTC)

Same here. I still marvel at the files that come out of it - even more 
appealing than tangerines. ;-) 

John Newell 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com> 
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:05:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8 


On Apr 12, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Henning Wulff wrote: 

> While many people, Nathan and Howard Cummer among them, have had problems 
> with their M8s there have also been many who haven't had any issue. Mine 
> (non-upgraded) have been just fine, and I didn't treat them any 
> differently than I treated earlier Leicas. Many tens of thousands of 
> photos, and they weren't babied and show the signs of use on edges and 
> slight dings. If the rangefinder is in proper adjustment everything works 
> just fine. 


Likewise. 

Regards, 
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com 
http://www.imagist.com 
http://www.imagist.com/blog 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist 






_______________________________________________ 
Leica Users Group. 
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8)