Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If I had to choose between a micro 4/3 and M8 I'd pick an M9. If not an M9 then certainly a top of the line full frame Canon or Nikon DSLR. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner > From: "J. Newell" <john.o.newell at comcast.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:01:21 +0000 (UTC) > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8 > > Same here. I still marvel at the files that come out of it - even more > appealing than tangerines. ;-) > > John Newell > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:05:52 PM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8 > > > On Apr 12, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Henning Wulff wrote: > >> While many people, Nathan and Howard Cummer among them, have had problems >> with their M8s there have also been many who haven't had any issue. Mine >> (non-upgraded) have been just fine, and I didn't treat them any >> differently >> than I treated earlier Leicas. Many tens of thousands of photos, and they >> weren't babied and show the signs of use on edges and slight dings. If the >> rangefinder is in proper adjustment everything works just fine. > > > Likewise. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information