Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My vote is for the digital frames. It gives the viewer a far greater variety of images to ponder, and the opportunity to linger on a single one if it's of particular interest. Plus, I doubt that the photographers would be wholly opposed to selling a old-fashioned paper print to someone who liked their work. Jim Shulman Wynnewood, PA Who just spent the afternoon showing off his recent shots on a Droid cell phone screen. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Zeitlin Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 8:51 PM To: Leica LUG Subject: [Leica] Photo show advice wanted. This Sunday, in my post retirement avocation as a free lance art critic, I was asked to review a major New York area photo show. The show was the 29 Annual Exhibit of the Photographers of Northern Westchester, sponsored by the Croton Council of the Arts. If you are familiar with the the photographic ecosystem of the New York area you will immediately recognize that Croton-on-Hudson is one of the few bedroom communities surrounding the city in which affluent and successful photographers, advertising executives, and TV nabobs choose to live. Others are Westport, and Katonah. (But never in New Jersey.) First let me say that the show was excellent, even judged against the high standards of the LUG. That's to be expected considering the occupations and the skills of the contributors. But the reason I'm posting this is to get opinions on a proposal offered by one of the show's organizers. As many photographers know, finding gallery space is difficult. There are more image makers out there than there are walls. Local galleries schedule shows two to three years in advance. What the show organizer wanted to know was if photographers would accept having their images shown on large professional quality digital displays rather than as paper prints on a wall. In effect the photographers would be time sharing the available space and could be able to exhibit a whole portfolio rather than a few mounted prints. So I am soliciting the opinion of Luggers on this question. How would you feel if a photo show consisted of an array of digital frames, each with a portfolio of pictures? The advantage is that more photographers could could exhibit more works. The disadvantage is that it flies against the photographic and artistic tradition of paper or canvas images on walls. Larry Z P.S. Of the 62 fine photos hung in the show, only 6 were in B&W. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information