Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 4/17/2011 7:50 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > This Sunday, in my post retirement avocation as a free lance art critic, I > was asked to review a major New York area photo show. The show was the 29 > Annual Exhibit of the Photographers of Northern Westchester, sponsored by > the Croton Council of the Arts. If you are familiar with the the > photographic ecosystem of the New York area you will immediately recognize > that Croton-on-Hudson is one of the few bedroom communities surrounding the > city in which affluent and successful photographers, advertising > executives, > and TV nabobs choose to live. Others are Westport, and Katonah. (But never > in New Jersey.) > > First let me say that the show was excellent, even judged against the high > standards of the LUG. That's to be expected considering the occupations and > the skills of the contributors. But the reason I'm posting this is to get > opinions on a proposal offered by one of the show's organizers. As many > photographers know, finding gallery space is difficult. There are more > image > makers out there than there are walls. Local galleries schedule shows two > to > three years in advance. What the show organizer wanted to know was if > photographers would accept having their images shown on large professional > quality digital displays rather than as paper prints on a wall. In effect > the photographers would be time sharing the available space and could be > able to exhibit a whole portfolio rather than a few mounted prints. > > So I am soliciting the opinion of Luggers on this question. How would you > feel if a photo show consisted of an array of digital frames, each with a > portfolio of pictures? The advantage is that more photographers could could > exhibit more works. The disadvantage is that it flies against the > photographic and artistic tradition of paper or canvas images on walls. > > Larry Z > > P.S. Of the 62 fine photos hung in the show, only 6 were in B&W. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Larry, What kind of digital frames are you referring? Would it be one PC monitor (or maybe even HDTV monitor) per exhibitor? Or one shared by exhibitors? Either way I can't see it working out. I have never seen canvas prints in a show, except at art fairs, so can't comment there, but prints are of course far different from back lighted digital images. I do hand my iPad to folks to see a portfolio, but invariably the prints are preferred. I have had a few exhibits of 20-30 framed prints, but if someone asked about a digital exhibit, my reaction would be no thanks, it sounds like more TV. Just my 2c as an old traditional fart. Best wishes with your reviewing. Ken