Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens
From: rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
 
I am trying to understand if I can take a wide angle photo using 
panning/stitching with a normal lens that would look like it was taken with 
a WA 
lens. My specific question is if I can get the same coverage and perspective 
using an 80mm Hassy lens and panning/stitching 3 or 4 overlapping shot as I 
could with the 40mm Hassy. 

If so how would this best be accomplished? Standing back further with the 80 
than with the 40 or just at the same spot with the panning. Would the 
image's 
perspective be the same?

Thanks to all who can help,
Bob
 Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
http://www.rgaphoto.com
Replies: Reply from fredhess at phenix-visuals.nl (Fred Hess) ([Leica] [LEICA] Red dots on the Red-cam)
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Reply from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs. WA Lens)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Red735i) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)