Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fw: OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens
From: rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
References: <687547.86382.qm@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <009d01cbfe02$963b4ed0$c2b1ec70$@earthlink.net> <p06230903c9d28a67d846@[10.0.1.4]> <182666.74713.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <p0623090bc9d2ad4b05b5@[10.0.1.4]>
And of course if you REALLY want to travel light:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1104/11041405rolleilensiphone4.asp
Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
http://www.rgaphoto.com
________________________________
From: Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Mon, April 18, 2011 8:10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens
...and if you really want lots of detail, with
not a big capital outlay or fuss, see:
http://www.gigapan.org
In reply to:
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Red735i) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)