Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, it is a consensus but is rarely reported as such in media. Here are the first 10 hits by relevancy with search term "Climate Change" for the New York Times, the paper of record. Is there any mention that the majority of the worlds scientists are in agreement? Or is the record one of creating doubt? You tell me. Just the headlines tell a pretty clear story. Climate Fight Is Heating Up In Deep Freeze<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=1> The New York Times, February 11, 2010 Thursday, Section A; Column 0; National Desk; Pg. 1, 808 words, By JOHN M. BRODER U.S. LOSING STATUS AS A WORLD LEADER IN CLIMATE SCIENCE <http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=2> The New York Times, June 11, 2001 Monday, Section A; Column 6; National Desk; Pg. 1, 1549 words, By ANDREW C. REVKIN Hacked E-Mail Data Prompts Calls for Changes in Climate Research<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=3> The New York Times, November 28, 2009 Saturday, Section A; Column 0; Foreign Desk; Pg. 8, 1178 words, By ANDREW C. REVKIN A Federal Climate Service Is Created to Provide Data<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=4> The New York Times, February 9, 2010 Tuesday, Section A; Column 0; National Desk; Pg. 14, 439 words, By JOHN M. BRODER That Climate Change E-Mail<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=5> The New York Times, December 6, 2009 Sunday, Section WK; Column 0; Editorial Desk; EDITORIAL; Pg. 9, 394 words Scientists Becoming Active In Defending Climate Data<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=6> The New York Times, March 3, 2010 Wednesday, Section A; Column 0; Foreign Desk; Pg. 11, 1321 words, By JOHN M. BRODER New Research Questions Uniqueness of Recent Warming<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=7> The New York Times, October 5, 2004 Tuesday, Section F; Column 2; Science Desk; Pg. 2, 811 words, By ANDREW C. REVKIN Nobel Halo Fades Fast For Panel On Climate<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=8> The New York Times, August 4, 2009 Tuesday Correction Appended, Section D; Column 0; Science Desk; Pg. 1, 1472 words, By ANDREW C. REVKIN Climate Fears Turn to Doubts Among Britons<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=9> The New York Times, May 25, 2010 Tuesday, Section A; Column 0; Foreign Desk; Pg. 1, 1283 words, By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL Consensus on Climate Change Ends at the TV Weather Desk<http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T11853788301&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T11853788308&cisb=22_T11853788307&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=6742&docNo=10> The New York Times, March 30, 2010 Tuesday, Section A; Column 0; National Desk; Pg. 1, 1270 words, By LESLIE KAUFMAN On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> wrote: > Actually, there is much evidence that tells us that current changes are NOT > within the normal range of variation. There has been a concerted spinning > of > the facts by large industry and energy interests to sow doubt, but real > scientists are overwhelmingly convinced that global weather change is > resulting from our current behavior. > > I am certainly no expert in the field, but if you read scientific rather > than popular media on the subject... > > ric > > > > > On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:29 AM, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote: > > > Besides isn't it reasonable to think that maybe, "just maybe?" The > changing weather atmosphere conditions are merely the changing ways that > have existed for eons on planet Earth? But because no one was around 1000's > of years a go or 100 years ago tracking weather in the manner so easily > done > in our modern electronic fact gathering of today? We really have no > absolute > record of the way it was? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >